A Unique Solution
Hysterectomies involve the removal of the uterus, sometimes with fallopian tubes and ovaries. When done with a minimally invasive approach, the procedure has several surgical challenges due to the loss of pneumoperitoneum during the dissection of the vaginal cuff. There is also a significant amount of smoke produced.
CONMED's AirSeal® system offers a unique solution by being able to maintain pneumoperitoneum even with an open vaginal cuff, while providing superior smoke evacuation to maintain field visibility. Its design also allows for easier ventilation by anesthesia for multiple comorbid patients in steep Trendelenburg. Clinical data has shown benefits to the patient, including reduced PACU stay, shorter procedure times, and reduced length of stay.1-4
CONMED's AirSeal® system offers a unique solution by being able to maintain pneumoperitoneum even with an open vaginal cuff, while providing superior smoke evacuation to maintain field visibility. Its design also allows for easier ventilation by anesthesia for multiple comorbid patients in steep Trendelenburg. Clinical data has shown benefits to the patient, including reduced PACU stay, shorter procedure times, and reduced length of stay.1-4
AirSeal® iFS
An access management platform that can improve the surgical experience by offering constant smoke evacuation* and increasing visualization with stable pneumoperitoneum, thus reducing procedure times4
airseal ifs system facing left showing features on display screen and tubing connection
AirSeal® Access Ports
Providing valve-free, unimpeded access to abdominal cavity and intact specimen removal
airseal access port facing left showing conmed airseal logo on face of access port
AirSeal® Filtered Tubing Sets
3-in-1 AirSeal® modality options accommodate your most advanced procedures to your most basic techniques
airseal tri-lumen filtered tube set angled right showing head and connection spot of tubing set
Related Products
* Constant smoke evacuation is only available in AirSeal and Smoke Evacuation modes.
1 Saway JP, McCaul M, Mulekar MS, McMahon DP, Richards WO. Review of Outcomes of Low Verses Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery. Am Surg. 2022;88(8):1832-1837. doi:10.1177/00031348221084956
2 Celarier S, Monziols S, Célérier B, et al. Low-pressure versus standard pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery (PAROS trial): a phase III randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2021;108(8):998-1005. doi:10.1093/bjs/znab069
3 Ferroni MC, Abaza R. Feasibility of robot-assisted prostatectomy performed at ultra-low pneumoperitoneum pressure of 6 mmHg and comparison of clinical outcomes vs standard pressure of 15 mmHg. BJU Int. 2019 Aug;124(2):308-313. doi: 10.1111/bju.14682. Epub 2019 Feb 7. PMID: 30653808.
4 George AK, Wimhofer R, Viola KV, Pernegger M, Costamoling W, Kavoussi LR, Loidl W. Utilization of a novel valveless trocar system during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1695-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1521-8. Epub 2015 Mar 1. PMID: 25725807.