Robotic-Assisted Myomectomy

Seamlessly integrate AirSeal® into your da Vinci robotic workflow without the need for an assist port.

Myomectomy, sometimes also called fibroidectomy, refers to the surgical removal of uterine leiomyomas, also known as fibroids. In contrast to a hysterectomy, the uterus remains preserved and the woman retains her reproductive potential. This procedure generates more surgical smoke than average. When done minimally invasive, CONMED's AirSeal® system provides superior smoke evacuation while maintaining a stable pneumoperitoneum at low pressure, which clinical data has shown reduced PACU stay, shorter procedure times, and reduced length of stay.1-4

AirSeal® Robotic Solution

Fully compatible with da Vinci X and XI systems so you can incorporate AirSeal® technology without the extra trocar

airseal robotic solution tubing and access port connected to each other

AIRSEAL®

AirSeal® iFS

Enables you to perform surgery at a set pressure with confidence, so you'll maintain your working space. Unlike conventional high-flow insufflation, AirSeal® maintains a stable pneumoperitoneum even with large leaks and heavy suction.1,2

1 Bucur P, Hofmann M, Menhadji A, et al. Comparison of Pneumoperitoneum Stability Between a Valveless Trocar System and Conventional Insufflation: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Urology. 2016;94:274280. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.022
2 Nepple KG, Kallogjeri D, Bhayani SB. Benchtop evaluation of pressure barrier insufflator and standard insufflator systems. SurgEndosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):333-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2434-x. Epub 2012 Jul 26. PMID: 22833262

airseal ifs system facing left showing features on display screen and tubing connection

When lives are in your hands, every detail matters...

including what you can't see.

Learn More

Related Products

* Constant smoke evacuation is only available in AirSeal and Smoke Evacuation modes.
1 Saway JP, McCaul M, Mulekar MS, McMahon DP, Richards WO. Review of Outcomes of Low Verses Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery. Am Surg. 2022;88(8):1832-1837. doi:10.1177/00031348221084956
2 Celarier S, Monziols S, Célérier B, et al. Low-pressure versus standard pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery (PAROS trial): a phase III randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2021;108(8):998-1005. doi:10.1093/bjs/znab069
3 Ferroni MC, Abaza R. Feasibility of robot-assisted prostatectomy performed at ultra-low pneumoperitoneum pressure of 6 mmHg and comparison of clinical outcomes vs standard pressure of 15 mmHg. BJU Int. 2019 Aug;124(2):308-313. doi: 10.1111/bju.14682. Epub 2019 Feb 7. PMID: 30653808.
4 George AK, Wimhofer R, Viola KV, Pernegger M, Costamoling W, Kavoussi LR, Loidl W. Utilization of a novel valveless trocar system during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1695-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1521-8. Epub 2015 Mar 1. PMID: 25725807.